Timeline for Confused about why closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26 at 21:11 | comment | added | SamGibson Mod | @dim - Hi, Re: "maybe a better close reason would have been "repair", instead of "use of electronics" in this specific case". Agreed, I can see that viewpoint. However I also remember an OP arguing when the "repair" closure reason was used on a reverse-engineering question with too little detail, saying that they didn't want to repair it, but wanted to improve it. || Due to the very limited choices of closure reason, we do end up with closures where although closure is going to be the outcome anyway, the specific closure reason text does not fit the situation exactly :( | |
| Feb 26 at 8:26 | comment | added | dim | I agree with this. However, maybe a better close reason would have been "repair", instead of "use of electronics" in this specific case. This would have been less confusing to the user. | |
| Feb 24 at 10:20 | vote | accept | GWR | ||
| Feb 23 at 16:31 | history | edited | SamGibsonMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed interactive -> iterative
|
| Feb 23 at 16:05 | history | answered | SamGibsonMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |