Timeline for Closing years old questions with accepted answers/Q&A obsolescence
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://electronics.stackexchange.com/ with https://electronics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 1, 2014 at 10:41 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackElectronix/status/439712018011271168 | ||
| Feb 24, 2014 at 6:15 | comment | added | Kaz | When Ohm's Law is repealed, we are in trouble. | |
| Feb 23, 2014 at 20:42 | comment | added | Matt Young | @Passerby That was my logic, and left it open. I think the best way to deal with these types of situations would be an automatic [archived] status after some time period, where no new answers can be added, and edits done only be users above some reputation threshold. Then the question is protected, content can be updated, and it's immediately obvious it's not an active question. | |
| Feb 23, 2014 at 20:41 | comment | added | Passerby | On top of that, the answer was posted by @kortuk, you know, a mod, who you would think knows a thing or two about questions that should or not have been closed, at the time. | |
| Feb 23, 2014 at 20:35 | comment | added | Passerby | Even yet, what about the evolving scope and close reasons? Things that were okay a few years ago might not be okay anymore (or vis-versa)? That question should have been left alone, not closed. | |
| Feb 21, 2014 at 19:22 | answer | added | Nick Alexeev | timeline score: -1 | |
| Feb 21, 2014 at 6:16 | answer | added | PeterJ | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 21, 2014 at 1:49 | history | asked | Matt Young | CC BY-SA 3.0 |