A particular user has managed to give 109 answers in 19 days with a rep to # of answers ratio of roughly 6.8 - this is an average of either 0 or 1 up vote per answer, or even worse, possibly more down votes than up votes given that down votes only subtract 2 points while up votes give 10 points.
Further more, many answers are suspect one sentence answers with little information backing it up.
I would prefer to not have this kind of contribution be acceptable in our community, but am not sure how to go about penalizing it. Is this a valid concern? Thoughts?