0
\$\begingroup\$

https://electronics.stackexchange.com/posts/203448/revisions has nothing to do with Arduino. Better off here, or closed.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ Neutral migration. The EE.SE answer to that question would be "Read datasheet. Write code." If there is a library in the open source, then the fellow arduinistas might point him to it, because they are more familiar with their own ecosystem. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 30, 2015 at 1:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ OK, it's been closed here (as was the only choice if it remained here). Happy now? \$\endgroup\$ Nov 30, 2015 at 12:55
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ The main problem with this was that the OP asked a question that was poorly worded and depended heavily on information that was in a previous question of theirs, without including or linking it. 'Read the datasheet' won't likely help the OP with designing an output tripler and filter for a DDS. Telling them it's too difficult for them might have been useful. Telling them to improve the question.. yes. But it was not about sending simple SPI commands to a DDS. \$\endgroup\$ Dec 1, 2015 at 22:12
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @SpehroPefhany so, your point is it is a poor question. The way to deal with poor questions is not to migrate them to Arduino.SE. It is as poor there as it is here. No need to migrate rubbish. \$\endgroup\$
    – user17592
    Dec 3, 2015 at 15:40

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .