I've a problem in understanding the feedback I get, mostly from one specific reviewer (although it's not limited to him per se); I got "This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability." feedback numerous times:
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/129264 https://electronics.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/129267 https://electronics.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/129326 https://electronics.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/129335 https://electronics.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/129347
All the edits done by me in a batch (mostly oscillator-related, because I was digging up that stuff during my research) were done in the exact same fashion I was doing for the last 5 years on SO: typography, defluffing, style corrections. Most of the times I've removed "developer story", salutations, added/removed missing/extraneous typographical characters or formatting markers etc.; those are IMO hardly things one would call "not making the post even a little bit easier to read & actively harming readability."
I'd understand if the feedback was that "I change the author's intent too much" (although I don't think it was the case in any of the scenarios). What's more funny, is that the reviewer who rejected those suggestions also accepted my other ones, virtually identical in scope and extent:
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/129265 https://electronics.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/129266 https://electronics.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/129320 https://electronics.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/129324 https://electronics.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/129331 https://electronics.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/129332 https://electronics.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/129333
Am I completely in the dark here, or is there something wrong with the reviewer's feedback?