1
\$\begingroup\$

After encountering two questions(digital, analog) that mis-use the tag and editing the analog question, I realized that there's not a tag for a very common EE task: have a signal of type X and need it in type Y to use it. Searching for the tags , , and show 0 results on all of them at the time of posting.

Would it be valuable to add (any of) these tags to help organize questions from simple voltage scaling/shifting to precision thermocouple or high-bandwidth RF inputs?

Some related (if possibly near-duplicate) questions from the above analog question:

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Analog and and analog front end are synonymous in my book \$\endgroup\$
    – Voltage Spike Mod
    Commented Sep 12, 2017 at 15:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ @laptop2d can you add this as a full answer? \$\endgroup\$
    – user2943160
    Commented Sep 17, 2017 at 0:00

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1
\$\begingroup\$

I agree that the board would benefit from and tags,
in general.

The questions in the O.P. are analog scaling jobs \$ v_2 = A v_1 + v_{offset} \$, where \$ v_1 \$, \$ A \$, \$ V_{offset} \$ aren't tough. These aren't hard enough analog jobs to properly qualify as "signal conditioning" or "analog front end".

Let's find harder questions.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Oh, there are certainly better questions and these should probably get a one-question-fits-most replacement referencing using opamps. \$\endgroup\$
    – user2943160
    Commented Sep 17, 2017 at 0:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .