Too many of your complaints say "depending". That is to say, "depending on if the work is good or bad". I retort that good work is good work, and bad work is bad. I am never ok with bad work.
But I'm super ok with hand-drawn graphics, as long as it is good work. As to your points:
- Handwriting should not be in a graphic, for search reasons. If it is doubled in the text, it is redundant and adds clutter to the graphic. But that is something you can fix.
- Formatting "might be" poor depending on screen size? Viewing quality content on a phone is like listening to Loveless or Dark Side of the Moon on a cellphone speaker. Surely you can't mean excellent content should be dumbed down to work well on your phone.
- If you use custom formatting options, and it doesn't handle all content well, your stuff is broken, not the contributor.
- Absolutely agreed, if a picture is hosted not at official SE locations, edit the post so it is. That is an SE policy not to rely on outside sites, which can 404 over time.
SE is a gift economy. People contribute freely like beer. Often we have real luminaries with very limited time to compose answers, so they use the tools they work best in. I draw my own circuit diagrams rather than use CircuitLab because I need to use 11 colors and I package info CircuitLab refuses to, like screw colors and cable bundling.
Others give, but you also are here to give. Your proper response to a posting you feel can be improved is not to throw rocks and judge, because that damages the gift economy by deterring giving. The proper response is to improve it. So feel free to edit the post, textify his handwriting, fire up Photoshop and cut up his doodle into several graphics and place them inline. Capture his intent, then comment to say "Did I capture your intent?"
I've done this for others, and it never occurred to me to be mad or bitter about it. I don't get your problem.
When you just fix it, you change the author in a different way, instead of driving him off, you get him thinking "you know, I could just do that myself" and next thing you know, he will. It's educating by demonstrating, rather than "educating" by rallying people into downvote harassment, which, I can't see where the pot of gold would be on that.