I don't have 300 rep yet on this website. A verilog-a (and maybe as well a Verilog-AMS) tag would be useful for a few questions, in my opinion.

  • \$\begingroup\$ How would it help to differentiate verilog-a and verilog-AMS from each other and other verilog questions? \$\endgroup\$
    – brhans
    Jul 19 '18 at 15:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ well verilog-a is a subset of verilog-ams so it would make more sense to have a verilog-ams tag instead \$\endgroup\$
    – JonRB
    Jul 19 '18 at 19:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ @brhans, there is no verilog-AMS tag for now, as far as I'm aware of. Also, @JonRb, as a subset of verilog-AMS, verilog-AMS answers wouldn't really help verilog-a-related questions. I concede that both would probably be quite a niche tag, though. \$\endgroup\$
    – MayeulC
    Jul 20 '18 at 13:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ Please point out those questions, then we can create the tag. \$\endgroup\$ Feb 24 at 4:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ Well, here is one that I asked: electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/386591/… (I was a bit dissatisfied with the answer, and got sidetracked later, I'll think of accepting it). Verilog-a is quite a different beast: you can input differential constraints between various signals, and not only handle discrete voltage levels, but flux (intensity, charges) as well, and in "analog"/floating point. Syntax is a bit different, and they are not directly compatible with each other, a bit like systemverilog, although that is a superset. \$\endgroup\$
    – MayeulC
    Mar 15 at 16:46

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .