The edit, AFAIK, is very relevant to the question, is factually true, and stays well within the scope of what the answer is trying to provide.
The edit itself is not sufficient for a standalone answer, and so is confined to just that..
The reason given is: "This edit deviates from the original intent of the post. Even edits that must make drastic changes should strive to preserve the goals of the post's owner."
I assume that, by the bold headings, that they're trying to explain the info in bits. I drop the relevant info into the relevant bit, and call it a day.
Why is this not so?