The tag is very meta, covers several categories. I nominate it to go away.


  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I don't have enough rep to edit your post so I'll just mention that if you use [tag:reverse] in your post instead of just the backticks it shows like this: reverse. It automatically becomes the link to the tag, so no need for the additional url. \$\endgroup\$
    – uhoh
    Commented Nov 11, 2019 at 13:56

1 Answer 1


I would agree; many of the questions tagged would be covered by the reverse-polaritytag latest questions tagged with reverse-polarity.

The first question in the latest for reverse is asking about a reversing light circuit on a car. How that adds any value to the question is beyond me.

The term reverse covers such a broad range that a proper definition would appear to be impossible and that being the case it adds no value (but does clutter the tags with a meaningless entry from my perspective)


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .