I don't know if it's only my impression, but I think that people don't vote.
Edit: An interesting article about votes: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/10/vote-early-vote-often/
I don't know if it's only my impression, but I think that people don't vote.
Edit: An interesting article about votes: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/10/vote-early-vote-often/
Just some notes on how important active participation (including voting) is on every site.
Posting questions and answers is only half of the equation. Voting is what provides the vetting (examination and evaluation) of the answers on this site. Without it, there's no expertise; just random thought that may or may not be correct.
Without voting, you will not have users with enough reputation to keep the site running smoothly. Without editors (+2000 rep users), the on-going quality of the posts will suffer. Without closers (+3000 rep users), the site is always in danger of succumbing to spam and declining quality.
Beta sites operate under reduced reputation requirements. When a site graduates from beta, the privilege levels return to their normal levels:
15 Vote up 15 Flag offensive 50 Leave comments† 100 Edit community wiki posts 125 Vote down (costs 1 rep) 150 Create new tags 200 Reduced advertising 200 Retag questions 250 Vote to close, reopen, or migrate your questions 1000 Show total up and down vote counts 2000 Edit other people's posts 3000 Vote to close, reopen, or migrate any questions 10000 Delete closed questions, access to moderation tools
Under represented sites (with low-rep users) will struggle when the site graduates.
We are seriously considering basing the graduation requirements on having enough 2000- and 3000-rep users to sustain the site, and not a hard 90-day limit.
If a site cannot take care of themselves, they are not ready for graduation. If they reach that point before 90 days, they should be able to move on.
Interesting observation. Is it in fact a fact, though? Curious mind could extract number of votes of each user, normalize it somehow (divide by activity for example) and compare to other exchange sites. I see in my imagination so many beautiful graphs as a results of such exercise :). Until that what is left is speculation and anecdotal evidences. (I do not have idea how to do it, but since there are stack exchange database dumps somebody with good scripting skills could do it)
Pages which have multiple commenters and active threads of discussion seem to attract more interest and more voting.