Should be a tag or should we go with something more generic, such as just DDR? I don't know enough about the technical details of DDR version to know if they are technically different enough to deserve their own tag.

What brought on me asking this is DDR1 Layout Considerations - DOs and DONTs that uses the tag even though it is about ddr1.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Fixed that post's tag ddr2->ddr. \$\endgroup\$ Jan 17, 2012 at 22:10

1 Answer 1


The tag is clearly wrong - The module in use is a LPDDR part, in spite of the title. Therefore, the tag should be changed.

At this time, we don't have enough questions on this to require separate LPDDR, DDR2, LPDDR2, DDR3, GDDR, etc. tags. For the time being, then, I think that all questions about double-data-rate busses should receive the tag.

If we get more of these questions, then we can retag this question .

Does everyone agree?


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .