Return to Answer

The flag menu matches the close menu exactly. They change together and there has to be a need for there to be an item added to the list.

Stats of interest for our site:

• Super User : 14 migrations (21% rejected) (The flags I almost always act on)
• DIY : 5 migrations (20% rejected) (The flags have mostly been correct)
• Physics: 4 migrations (The flags have mostly been correct)
• Math : 4 migrations (25% rejected) (The flags have mostly been correct)
• SO : 2 migrations

Now, an important point, at least to me, is that these migrations only track those that a diamond moderator saw and approved. That means, and I know this to be the case, there are many many more "rejected" migrations for all of them. Sadly, I can not easily pull statistics on that so I have added a note.

Looking at this, it might make sense to add at least Super User, maybe even DIY/Physics/math. I will contact the SE comm team and see their thoughts.

Here is a screenshot of stats for the last 90 days. Take a look for yourself(for those that are not 10k users yet):

Updated migration information as of 2013/8/7.

The flag menu matches the close menu exactly. They change together and there has to be a need for there to be an item added to the list.

Stats of interest for our site:

• Super User : 14 migrations (21% rejected) (The flags I almost always act on)
• DIY : 5 migrations (20% rejected) (The flags have mostly been correct)
• Physics: 4 migrations (The flags have mostly been correct)
• Math : 4 migrations (25% rejected) (The flags have mostly been correct)
• SO : 2 migrations

Now, an important point, at least to me, is that these migrations only track those that a diamond moderator saw and approved. That means, and I know this to be the case, there are many many more "rejected" migrations for all of them. Sadly, I can not easily pull statistics on that so I have added a note.

Looking at this, it might make sense to add at least Super User, maybe even DIY/Physics/math. I will contact the SE comm team and see their thoughts.

Here is a screenshot of stats for the last 90 days. Take a look for yourself(for those that are not 10k users yet):

Updated migration information as of 2013/8/7.

Updated migration information as of 2013/9/3.

The flag menu matches the close menu exactly. They change together and there has to be a need for there to be an item added to the list.

Stats of interest for our site:

• Super User : 14 migrations (21% rejected) (The flags I almost always act on)
• DIY : 5 migrations (20% rejected) (The flags have mostly been correct)
• Physics: 4 migrations (The flags have mostly been correct)
• Math : 4 migrations (25% rejected) (The flags have mostly been correct)
• SO : 2 migrations

Now, an important point, at least to me, is that these migrations only track those that a diamond moderator saw and approved. That means, and I know this to be the case, there are many many more "rejected" migrations for all of them. Sadly, I can not easily pull statistics on that so I have added a note.

Looking at this, it might make sense to add at least Super User, maybe even DIY/Physics/math. I will contact the SE comm team and see their thoughts.

Here is a screenshot of stats for the last 90 days. Take a look for yourself(for those that are not 10k users yet):

edit [Nick] Can we re-run the migration statistics, please?
It's been another 90 days. I think, the approach to migration have improved among active members in the recent months. I wonder it it shows in the statistics.
[ Since this is meta, I took a liberty to edit rather than comment, so that the thread gets on top. Feel free to roll back. ]

The flag menu matches the close menu exactly. They change together and there has to be a need for there to be an item added to the list.

Stats of interest for our site:

• Super User : 14 migrations (21% rejected) (The flags I almost always act on)
• DIY : 5 migrations (20% rejected) (The flags have mostly been correct)
• Physics: 4 migrations (The flags have mostly been correct)
• Math : 4 migrations (25% rejected) (The flags have mostly been correct)
• SO : 2 migrations

Now, an important point, at least to me, is that these migrations only track those that a diamond moderator saw and approved. That means, and I know this to be the case, there are many many more "rejected" migrations for all of them. Sadly, I can not easily pull statistics on that so I have added a note.

Looking at this, it might make sense to add at least Super User, maybe even DIY/Physics/math. I will contact the SE comm team and see their thoughts.

Here is a screenshot of stats for the last 90 days. Take a look for yourself(for those that are not 10k users yet):

Updated migration information as of 2013/8/7.

The flag menu matches the close menu exactly. They change together and there has to be a need for there to be an item added to the list.

Stats of interest for our site:

• Super User : 14 migrations (21% rejected) (The flags I almost always act on)
• DIY : 5 migrations (20% rejected) (The flags have mostly been correct)
• Physics: 4 migrations (The flags have mostly been correct)
• Math : 4 migrations (25% rejected) (The flags have mostly been correct)
• SO : 2 migrations

Now, an important point, at least to me, is that these migrations only track those that a diamond moderator saw and approved. That means, and I know this to be the case, there are many many more "rejected" migrations for all of them. Sadly, I can not easily pull statistics on that so I have added a note.

Looking at this, it might make sense to add at least Super User, maybe even DIY/Physics/math. I will contact the SE comm team and see their thoughts.

Here is a screenshot of stats for the last 90 days. Take a look for yourself(for those that are not 10k users yet):

The flag menu matches the close menu exactly. They change together and there has to be a need for there to be an item added to the list.

Stats of interest for our site:

• Super User : 14 migrations (21% rejected) (The flags I almost always act on)
• DIY : 5 migrations (20% rejected) (The flags have mostly been correct)
• Physics: 4 migrations (The flags have mostly been correct)
• Math : 4 migrations (25% rejected) (The flags have mostly been correct)
• SO : 2 migrations

Now, an important point, at least to me, is that these migrations only track those that a diamond moderator saw and approved. That means, and I know this to be the case, there are many many more "rejected" migrations for all of them. Sadly, I can not easily pull statistics on that so I have added a note.

Looking at this, it might make sense to add at least Super User, maybe even DIY/Physics/math. I will contact the SE comm team and see their thoughts.

Here is a screenshot of stats for the last 90 days. Take a look for yourself(for those that are not 10k users yet):

edit [Nick] Can we re-run the migration statistics, please?
It's been another 90 days. I think, the approach to migration have improved among active members in the recent months. I wonder it it shows in the statistics.
[ Since this is meta, I took a liberty to edit rather than comment, so that the thread gets on top. Feel free to roll back. ]