Timeline for Should questions about ChatGPT responses be closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2023 at 13:46 | comment | added | Ray Butterworth | "feedback mechanism to tell the AI if the result was good or bad" — the conversation can continue. I asked about Common Crew & Cast in two films and it gave not only a great answer, but found the perfect person to be that common link. Unfortunately, it wasn't true. I pointed this out and it replied "I apologize for the error in my previous response. You are correct …". Even worse, Coprime Matroid is a seemingly convincing math proof of an untruth. | |
| Jan 21, 2023 at 21:28 | comment | added | occipita | Read about how it was trained -- initial training was with random text from the Internet ("Common Crawl" and Wikipedia, mostly), but the training was finished with custom-designed question & answer sessions with experts, and then generated responses were rated additionally by more experts. I don't think this is a serious concern. | |
| Jan 13, 2023 at 15:55 | comment | added | Criticizing Israel not allowed | everything I don't like is 'wokeness' | |
| Jan 11, 2023 at 8:11 | comment | added | tobalt | Of course there is a) a way to like/dislike its answers right in the interface and even add a clarifying comments b) a strong incentive for its devs to improve its answers based on such feedback... | |
| Jan 10, 2023 at 23:40 | history | answered | Kartman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |